Policies and Guidelines2024-25 SCARD Fellowship Embargo GuidelinesSCARD is pleased to announce the continuation of our fellowship embargo program. The program has been extremely successful in meeting its objectives of improving the fairness of the fellowship application process and providing our residents more time to experience all of Radiology sub-specialties before choosing their future career. In order to maintain flexibility, sub-specialties can either utilize the match or comply with the embargo dates. Based on feedback from many of you, we have made some significant changes to our guidelines, particularly regarding the first date of interviews, the first date to offer acceptances and the grace period. Below are the guidelines for this coming year (2024-25). Yelllow highlighting denotes updates from last year.
To summarize the important dates for both match and non-match programs:
This proposal is supported by the Association of Program Directors in Radiology, the Association of Program Directors in Interventional Radiology, the Society of Skeletal Radiology, the Society of Thoracic Radiology, the American Society of Emergency Radiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, the Society of Breast Imaging, the Society of Interventional Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology, and the Society of Abdominal Radiology. SCARD believes it is critical for all fellowship programs to follow these guidelines and we ask all Chairs to ensure that their departments follow this proposal unless they notify SCARD that they are opting out.
Suggested Guidelines for Radiology Fellowship Applicant Second VisitsThese guidelines apply to radiology fellowships that participate in the Match. The COVID pandemic has altered the way in which interviews for residencies and fellowships have long been conducted. The move to virtual interviews has positive and negative implications. On the positive side, the virtual interviews allow a more standardized experience for the candidates, a decrease in cost for both candidates and programs, and a decrease in amount of time away from their current training and/or school (i.e. less time traveling and being off service). On the negative side, the lack of candidates getting to personally view a program and the location can make deciding on a new location difficult and for programs the lack of having the candidate visit can make recruitment more difficult. However, even before the pandemic the concern of inequity in the ability of candidates to travel to potential locations was being discussed. This inequity was related to both the costs of traveling and also to various institutional policies related to time off to travel to interviews. Foremost of concern with a mix of virtual and in-person interviews is that there will be inherent bias in having some candidates do virtual interviews and others do in-person interviews. This concern also exists with optional second visits. Note that although some programs may consider that allowing candidates to visit and talk with current fellows and residents while not contacting or interacting with program leadership is sufficient to assure candidates that the visit is not being used as a de facto ‘interview,’ there is concern among many that candidates will believe that the interactions with residents and fellows is somehow being used to assess and rank the candidate. It has often been said to candidates that any interaction with the program should be considered as part of the program’s assessment of the candidate. It is very hard to eliminate that perception by candidates and thus they may be hesitant to visit a program or feel that it is vitally important to visit in order to have a chance at getting highly ranked. Each program should consider how they can reassure applicants that a second visit is truly optional and will not be used in determining their rank list. Setting up a transparent process for assessing and ranking candidates that reduces these biases (or at least the perception of bias) is important. One possible solution that programs may choose to use is as follows:
SCARD STATEMENT OF PROFESSIONALISMWe, the members of SCARD, believe that every member of our many organizations should be valued and feel included. All voices should be heard. To assure a collaborative and inclusive culture, radiologists, interventional radiologists, radiation oncologists, and medical physicists should conduct themselves in a professional manner, respecting all individuals, including patients and colleagues, and advocate for those who cannot advocate for themselves. We welcome all members. We shall not discriminate based on race, color, national origin, language, religion, marital or parental status, age, citizenship, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or disability. While we embrace free speech and the power of open discourse and debate during our professional society meetings and on social media platforms, we do not condone any forms of harassment, bullying behaviors, or speech that marginalizes or attacks others. By upholding this endorsed Statement of Professionalism, we promise to treat each human being with steadfast dignity, kindness and respect at all times so that our central mission remains focused on providing exceptional, compassionate care for all.
SCARD FALL MEETING ATTENDANCE POLICYIn order to preserve the purpose, goals, and nature of engagement in the SCARD annual Fall Meeting, attendance shall be limited to radiology department chairs who are members or who are eligible for membership, in addition to their radiology department senior business officer. Vice Chairs participating in the in-person mentoring program are invited to attend the first day of the SCARD Fall Meeting. Approved by Membership October 2019
SCARD STATEMENT ON PAID PARENTAL LEAVEThe Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD), as stated in our bylaws, advances the art and science of radiology by the development of policies and initiatives essential for the success of the clinical, research and educational missions of radiology and imaging sciences 1. Faculty wellbeing and diversity with inclusion are necessary for this success. Supported parental leave is not only about health and wellness, it also about equity and creation of an inclusive environment. It is recognized that there are alternative family structures beyond the traditional mother as the primary caregiver, and our policies must support this. Moreover, if we as leaders truly intend to address and eradicate inequities, we must adopt more inclusive policies. SCARD members support the American Association for Women Radiologists and pledge to strive for departmental, institutional, and organizational change that provides 12 weeks of paid parental leave for eligible* faculty members of all genders. *Defined per the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
POLICY FOR ACCESS TO THE SCARD MAILING/EMAIL LIST
All requests to use the mail list are reviewed by the President prior to distribution of message.
E-MAIL LIST USE
All requests to use the email list are reviewed by the President prior to distribution of message.
Updated October 2020 |